Factores de predicción de dosificación inadecuada de rivaroxabán utilizando la ecuación de CKD-EPI / Rivaroxaban Inappropriate Dosage Predictor Factors Using The Ckd-Epi Equation

No disponible

TIMI-AF score and cardiovascular events in vitamin K antagonists-naïve outpatients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The TIMI-AF score predicts poor outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and guides selection of anticoagulant therapy by identifying clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA). HYPOTHESIS: Our objective was to determine the ability to predict cardiovascular events according to the TIMI-AF score in a real-world population. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of VKA-naïve patients with AF was seen at a cardiology outpatient clinic in Spain between November 2012 and August 2014. We recorded adverse events (myocardial infarction, systemic embolism or stroke, major bleeding, and death). RESULTS: The study population comprised of 426 patients (50.7% men, mean age, 69 ± 14 years). The TIMI-AF score identified 372 patients (87.3%) with a low risk, 50 patients (11.7%) with an intermediate risk, and 4 patients (0.9%) with a high risk. After a mean follow-up of 423.4 ± 200.1 days, 37 patients (9%) experienced an adverse event. Patients with a TIMI-AF score ≥ 7 had a poorer cardiovascular prognosis (HR, 6.1; 95%CI, 3.2-11.7; P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of TIMI-AF was 0.755 (95%CI, 0.669-0.840; P < 0.001), which was greater than that of CHA2 DS2 VASc (0.641; 95%CI, 0.559-0.724; P = 0.004), HAS-BLED (0.666; 95%CI, 0.578-0.755; P < 0.001), and SAMeTT2 R2 (0.529; 95%CI, 0.422-0.636; P = 0.565). Similar results were obtained in relation to the net clinical outcome (life-threatening bleeding, disabling stroke, or all-cause mortality). CONCLUSIONS: The TIMI-AF risk score can identify patients who are at greater risk of cardiovascular events and a poor net clinical outcome with a better diagnostic yield than CHA2 DS2 VASc, HAS-BLED, and SAMeTT2 R2 .

Drug persistence and outcomes in a cohort of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban after 2 years of follow-up in clinical practice.

AIM: To evaluate medication persistence and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation after 2 years of treatment with rivaroxaban in routine practice. METHODS: Retrospective study of atrial fibrillation patients in whom rivaroxaban was prescribed during the first quarter of 2014 in the healthcare area of Costa del Sol (Málaga). RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (mean age 74.9 ± 10.9 years; 52.3% men; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.6 ± 1.3; HAS-BLED 1.3 ± 0.6) were included. A total of 96.3 and 90.6% of patients remained on rivaroxaban therapy after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. During this period, stroke, net clinical benefit outcome (thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and major bleeding) and cardiovascular death occurred in 3.6, 5.4 and 1.8% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In routine practice, medication persistence with rivaroxaban was high. Rates of major cardiac events were low.

Discrepancias entre el empleo de las ecuaciones MDRD-4 IDMS y CKD-EPI en vez de la de Cockcroft-Gault en la determinación de la posología de los anticoagulantes orales directos en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular / Discrepancies between the use of MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI equations, instead of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, in the determination of the dosage of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Fundamento y objetivo: Los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) precisan ajuste de dosis según el estimated clearance creatinine (eClCr, «aclaramiento de creatinina estimado») por la ecuación de Cockcroft-Gault (CG). Existen discrepancias entre las ecuaciones que estiman el filtrado glomerular (FGe). Analizamos cómo afecta a la posología recomendada para los ACOD el empleo de las ecuaciones CKD-EPI y MDRD-4 IDMS. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular atendidos en una consulta de cardiología entre noviembre de 2012 y agosto de 2014. Se reclasifican los pacientes según la posología recomendada para dabigatrán, rivaroxabán, apixabán y edoxabán en función de la ecuación de FGe empleada. Se tienen en cuenta otros factores clínicos, según ficha técnica. Analizamos el porcentaje de discordancia. Resultados: Se estudian 454 pacientes, 53,3% hombres, con una edad media de 68,7±13,8 años. La media de las diferencias intraindividuales registradas respecto a la ecuación de GC fue de 3,9ml/min/1,73m2 con MDRD-4 IDMS (IC 95% 1,4-6,4; p=0,003) y 11,3ml/min/1,73m2 con CKD-EPI (IC 95% 8,9-13,7; p<0,001). Se observa un gradiente en la discordancia de la posología (apixabán 1,1%, dabigatrán 3,5%, edoxabán 5,7%, rivaroxabán 8,4% con MDRD-4 IDMS). Las diferencias se limitaron a los pacientes con eClCr<60ml/min y fueron más manifiestas en≥75 años, en los que las ecuaciones de FGe sobreestiman la función renal. Conclusiones: En pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, especialmente con insuficiencia renal y en ancianos, las ecuaciones de FGe tienden a sobreestimar la función renal respecto a CG y, por ello, a recomendar una sobredosificación de los ACOD (AU)

Background and objective: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) require dose adjustment according to estimated clearance creatinine (eClCr) using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation. There are discrepancies with the equations that estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We analyse how the use of the CKD-EPI and MDRD-4 IDMS equations affect the recommended dosage for ACODs. Patients and methods: Retrospective study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation seen at a cardiology clinic between November 2012 and August 2014. Patients were reclassified according to the recommended dosage for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, based on the eGFR equation used. Other clinical factors are taken into account, according to the product label. We analysed the percentage of discordance. Results: Four hundred and fifty-four patients, 53.3% men, with a mean age of 68.7±13.8 years were studied. The mean intra-individual differences recorded for the CG equation were 3.9ml/min/1.73m2 with MDRD-4 IDMS (95% CI 1.4-6.4, P=.003) and 11.3ml/min/1.73m2 with CKD-EPI (95% CI 8.9-13.7, P<.001). A gradient is observed in the discordance of the posology (apixaban 1.1%, dabigatran 3.5%, edoxaban 5.7%, rivaroxaban 8.4% with MDRD-4 IDMS). Differences were limited to patients with eClCr<60ml/min and were more evident in≥75 years in which the eGFR equations overestimate renal function. Conclusions: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, especially with renal failure and in the elderly, eGFR equations tend to overestimate renal function relative to CG and therefore suggest an overdose of DOACs (AU)

Discrepancies between the use of MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI equations, instead of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, in the determination of the dosage of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. / Discrepancias entre el empleo de las ecuaciones MDRD-4 IDMS y CKD-EPI en vez de la de Cockcroft-Gault en la determinación de la posología de los anticoagulantes orales directos en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) require dose adjustment according to estimated clearance creatinine (eClCr) using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation. There are discrepancies with the equations that estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We analyse how the use of the CKD-EPI and MDRD-4 IDMS equations affect the recommended dosage for ACODs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation seen at a cardiology clinic between November 2012 and August 2014. Patients were reclassified according to the recommended dosage for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, based on the eGFR equation used. Other clinical factors are taken into account, according to the product label. We analysed the percentage of discordance. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-four patients, 53.3% men, with a mean age of 68.7±13.8 years were studied. The mean intra-individual differences recorded for the CG equation were 3.9ml/min/1.73m2 with MDRD-4 IDMS (95% CI 1.4-6.4, P=.003) and 11.3ml/min/1.73m2 with CKD-EPI (95% CI 8.9-13.7, P<.001). A gradient is observed in the discordance of the posology (apixaban 1.1%, dabigatran 3.5%, edoxaban 5.7%, rivaroxaban 8.4% with MDRD-4 IDMS). Differences were limited to patients with eClCr<60ml/min and were more evident in≥75 years in which the eGFR equations overestimate renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, especially with renal failure and in the elderly, eGFR equations tend to overestimate renal function relative to CG and therefore suggest an overdose of DOACs.